Preventing Workplace Rejection at Your Desk: Steer Clear of These 5 Blunders

Scholarly Submission Survival Guide: Dodging Desk Rejections

Preventing Workplace Rejection at Your Desk: Steer Clear of These 5 Blunders

Hey there! Rejection stings, but as a researcher, it's a hurdle you'll face often. Classic study findings show that journal rejection rates range between 22.6% and 73.4%, depending on the journal. Top journals often reject over 90% of submitted manuscripts. That's tough! But don't lose hope just yet, as over 62% of published manuscripts have been rejected at least once previously. American inventor Thomas Edison said it best: "Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time."

So, how do you steer clear of the dreaded desk rejection and keep your publishing dreams alive? Here's a guide to help you navigate the scholarly publishing world more successfully:

Battling Desk Rejections Like a Pro

Understand the common pitfalls that lead to desk rejection and employ these expert tips to boost your odds of publication success:

Mistake 1: Failing to Ensure Originality and Matching the Journal's Aim

Submitting research that is not original, innovative, or a good fit for the journal's overall objectives is a surefire recipe for a desk rejection.

Solution for researchers:

• Carefully select the most suitable journal for your paper and explain why your findings are significant for their audience.
• Conduct research that has broad applicability and makes a substantial impact on your specific research field.

Mistake 2: Presenting a Sloppy Manuscript

Sloppy presentation, frequent language blunders, and spelling mistakes can lead to swift desk rejections.

Solution for researchers:

• Pay close attention to the language of your research, fixing significant errors, using technical terms accurately, and keeping a minimal jargon count.
• Structure your paper according to the recommended format for your target journal, highlighting crucial points for a more polished final product.

Mistake 3: Ethical Missteps

Ethical slip-ups, such as plagiarism, simultaneous submissions, and other unethical practices are bound to earn desk rejections.

Solution for researchers:

• Cite sources correctly to avoid plagiarism, even when referring to your own published work.
• Submit your manuscript only once to a single journal, waiting patiently for a decision before submitting to another.

Mistake 4: Flawed Research Methodology or Study Design

A shaky research methodology or study design is a red flag for editors and can lead to a rejection straightaway.

Solution for researchers:

• Conduct a thorough review of relevant literature to identify the best research methodology and processes for your project.
• Articulate a clear, concise problem statement for your study that highlights its significance to minimize the risk of desk rejection.

Mistake 5: Ignoring Inconsistencies and Exceeding the Manuscript Length

Inconsistencies between tables, figures, and text, and reference numbering errors can lead to a desk rejection.

Solution for researchers:

• Check for inconsistencies and attentively proofread your work to eliminate errors.
• Follow the recommended word count for your target journal, avoiding manipulation of line spacing, fonts, or masking the actual manuscript length.

The path to scholarly publishing is a challenging one, with plenty of stumbling blocks and rejections on the road. But armed with knowledge and the right strategies, you can increase your chances of making it through successfully. Stay resilient, and remember, Thomas Edison's wisdom rings true: "The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time."

Need an extra push? Check out our platform, Preflight, for a smart manuscript readiness check that offers the confidence you need to submit with assurance.

References:

1. S. Ehara, K. Takahashi - Reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to AJR by international authors. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17242215/
2. S. Goldfinch, K. Yamamoto - Peer review, refereeing and their discontents: a failed model or simply the least worst option? Prometheus Assessed? Research Measurement, Peer Review, and Citation Analysis. ScienceDirect, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122111000277
3. S.A. Hall, A.J Wilcox - The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology. Epidemiology, 2007. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17301708/

Related Reads:

1. Top 5 Ethical Considerations in Research
2. Research Paper Writing: A 15-Point Academic Writing Checklist
3. How to Write a Conclusion for Research Papers (with Examples)
4. 8 Most Effective Ways to Increase Motivation for Thesis Writing

Enrichment Data:To perform a smart manuscript submission readiness check and minimize the risk of desk rejection in scholarly publishing, follow these key steps:

1. Review Journal Instructions Carefully

• Match Manuscript to Scope: Ensure your manuscript fits the aims and scope of the target journal. Check that it falls within their area of interest and that your research goals are appropriate.
• Adhere to Formatting Guidelines: Meet the formatting requirements for word limits, manuscript structure, specific journal formatting, and reference styles.
• Check Mandatory Documents: Include required submission forms (e.g., cover letter, checklist, conflict of interest, author contributions) as listed by the journal.

2. craft a compelling Cover Letter

• Highlight Key Advances: Clearly state the novelty and significance of your work in the cover letter. Address how your research advances the field beyond existing literature.
• Originality Statement: Declare that your manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal.

3. Self-Assessment for Clarity and Completeness

• Abstract and Title: Write a clear, informative title and a structured abstract that summarizes the objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
• Research in Context: For some journals, include a brief summary explaining the relevance and context of your research.
• Checklist Compliance: Use relevant reporting checklists (e.g., PRISMA for systematic reviews, STROBE for observational studies, SRQR for qualitative research) to ensure all required elements are present.
• Data Integrity: Ensure raw or uncropped images, gels, and supplementary data are available if required.

4. Prepare Required Supporting Documentation

• Author Information: Provide full author names, affiliations, and contact details.
• Funding and Ethics: Include details of funding sources, grant numbers, and, if applicable, clinical trial registration numbers.
• Conflict of Interest: Submit a completed conflict of interest form for each author.

5. Suggested and Opposed Reviewers

• Suggested Reviewers: Propose at least six potential reviewers from at least three different countries, excluding those with close professional or personal ties to the authors.
• Opposed Reviewers (if needed): Note any reviewers you wish to exclude, specifying reasons if required by the journal.

6. Disclose Previous Submissions

• Previous Rejections: If the manuscript was previously rejected, provide the manuscript number and a detailed response to reviewer comments (for ACS, required; for others, optional but recommended).
• Status of Cited Manuscripts: Indicate if cited papers are in press or under review.

7. Final Readiness Checklist

• Manuscript: Word or PDF version, with all sections, tables, and figures included.
• Supplementary Materials: All additional files and data.
• Online Submission: Follow the journal’s online submission system instructions carefully.

Additional Tips

• Peer Review: Have colleagues or mentors review your manuscript for clarity, logic, and adherence to guidelines before submission.
• Avoid Common Errors: Double-check references, ensure all authors have approved the manuscript, and verify that all required ethical approvals are documented.

By systematically addressing each requirement and potential source of desk rejection, you maximize your manuscript’s readiness for scholarly submission and peer review.

1. To boost your chances of publication success, ensure the originality and appropriateness of your research paper for the target journal.
2. Sloppy presentation and frequent language mistakes can lead to desk rejections, so it's crucial to carefully proofread your work and use technical terms accurately.
3. Ethical missteps such as plagiarism, simultaneous submissions, and other unethical practices should be avoided to prevent desk rejections.
4. A shaky research methodology or study design can lead to rejection, so make sure to conduct a thorough review of relevant literature and articulate a clear problem statement.
5. Check for inconsistencies and reference numbering errors to minimize the risk of desk rejection and adhere to the recommended word count for your target journal.
6. Stay resilient, and remember Thomas Edison's wisdom: "The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time." Additionally, use Preflight, our platform that offers a smart manuscript readiness check to increase your confidence in submitting your research paper.
7. For a successful scholarly submission, carefully review journal instructions, craft a compelling cover letter, self-assess for clarity and completeness, prepare required supporting documentation, and complete final manuscript readiness checks.
8. Peer review from colleagues or mentors can help identify clarity, logic, and adherence to submission guidelines, and avoiding common errors such as double-checked references, verifying all approvals are documented, and ensuring all authors have approved the manuscript, can increase the chances of bypassing desk rejections.
9. Other related reads include Top 5 Ethical Considerations in Research, Research Paper Writing: A 15-Point Academic Writing Checklist, How to Write a Conclusion for Research Papers (with Examples), and 8 Most Effective Ways to Increase Motivation for Thesis Writing.
10. To help minimize desk rejection, pay attention to lifestyle factors such as proper time management, stress reduction, and maintaining a healthy diet, as they can have a positive impact on academic writing and overall productivity. Furthermore, staying up-to-date with fashion-and-beauty, food-and-drink, home-and-garden, relationships, pets, travel, and cars trends can provide inspiration and improve overall work-life balance.

Read also: